Elements of an information literacy program: Self-efficacy towards computer use
Keywords:
Alfabetización informacional, autoeficacia, computadoras, estudiantes universitarios, TICAbstract
A study about the influence of sociodemographic and personality variables of self-efficacy on the computers of students at the Universidad Católica Andrés Bello (Venezuela) in two distinct areas of knowledge: social and technological sciences. The results suggest the need to organize information literacy programs to guide students in effective use of ICT and also multiply their experiences in the academic community.
References
ACM SIGCHI. (1996). Human-Computer Interaction. En Curricula for Human-Computer Interaction (Cap. 2). Disponible en: http://old.sigchi.org/cdg/cdg2.html
American Psychological Association (APA). (2002). Manual de estilo de publicaciones de la APA. (2ª. ed.). (M. Chavez, Trad.). México: Editorial El Manual Moderno. (Trabajo original publicado en 2001).
Artis, S. (2005). The effects of Age, Computer Self-Efficacy, and the Desing of Web-based Training on Computer Task performance. Blacksburg, Virginia: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Thesis for the degree of Master of Science in Industrial and Systems Engineering.
Auzmendi, E. (1992). Las actitudes hacia la matemática/estadística en las enseñanzas medias y universitaria: características y medición. Bilbao: Mensajero.
Bandura, A. (1986). Pensamiento y acción: fundamentos sociales. (s.l.): Martínez Roca.
Borém, G. A. (2003). Interfaces entre a ciência da informação e a ciencia cognitiva. Ciência da Informação, 32 (1), 77-87.
Brosnan, M. J. (1998). The impact of computer anxiety and self-efficacy upon performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14, 223-234.
Calderín, M. (2007). Incidencia de las variables sociodemográficas y de personalidad sobre la autoeficacia hacia la computadora en estudiantes universitarios. Trabajo de Grado de Maestría no publicado, Universidad Católica Andrés Bello, Caracas, Venezuela.
Castells, M. (2001). La era de la información: la sociedad en red (2ª. ed., Vol. 1). (C. Martínez y J. Alvorés, Trads.). Madrid: Alianza Editorial. (Trabajo original publicado en 1996).
Chung, S. H., Schwager, P. H. y Turner, D. E. (2002, summer). An Empirical study of students’ computer self-efficacy: differences among four academic disciplines at a large university. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1-6.
Compeau, D. R. y Higgins, C. A. (1995a). Application of Social Cognitive Theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research, 6 (2), 118-143.
Compeau, D. R. y Higgins, C. A. (1995b, junio). Computer self-efficacy: development of a Measure and Initial Test. MIS Quarterly, 19 (2), 189-211.
Cornella, A. (1994). Los Recursos de la información: ventaja competitiva de las empresas. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
Chung, D. y Soo, Ch. (2007). An analysis of the variables predicting instant messenger use. New media & Society. 9 (2). 212-234.
Dambrot, F. H., Watkins-Malek, M. A., Silling, S. M., Marshall, R. S. y Garver, J. A. (1985). Correlates of Sex Differences in Attitudes toward and Involvement with Computer. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 27, 71-86.
Doyle, E., Stamouli, I. y Huggard, M. (2005, Octubre). Computer anxiety, self-efficacy, computer experience: an investigation throughout a computer science degree. Artículo presentado en la 35th ASSEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conferences. Session S2H-6, Indianapolis, EEUU.
ETS. (2002). Digital transformation: A framework for ICT literacy. A report of International Information and Communication Literacy Panel. USA: Educational Testing Service.
Fagan, M. H., Neill, S. y Ross, B. (2003-2004, winter). An Empirical investigation into the relationship between computer self-efficacy, anxiety, experience, support and usage. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 95-104.
Gardner, W. L. y Rozell, E. J. (2000). Cognitive, motivation, and affective processes associated with coputer-related performance: a path analysis. Computer in Human Bahavior, 16, 199-222.
Harrison, A. W. y Rainer, R. K. (1992). The influence of individual differences on Skill in End-User Computing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9 (1), 93-111.
Hartzel, K. (2003). How self-efficacy and gender issues affect software adoption and use. Communications of the ACM, 46 (9), 167-171.
Hassan, B. (2003). The influence of specific computer experiences on computer self-efficacy beliefs. Computer in Human Behavior, 19, 443-450.
Havelka, D. (2003a). Predicting software self efficacy among business students: a preliminary assessment. Journal of Information Systems Education, 4(2), 145-152.
Havelka, D. (2003b). Students Beliefs and Attitudes toward Information Technology. Information Systems Education Journal, 1 (40). Disponible en: http://proc.isecon.org/2003/2434/ISECON.2003.Havelka.pdf
Hoffman, M. y Blake, J. (2003). Computer Literacy: Today and Tomorrow. Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, 18 (5), 221-233.
Hong, W., Thong, J. Y., Wong, W. y Tam, K. Y. (2001-2002, winter). Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18 (3), 97-124.
Joyanes, L. (1997). Cibersociedad: los retos sociales ante un nuevo mundo digital, Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
Kerlinger, F. y Lee, H. (2002). Investigación del comportamiento: Métodos de investigación en ciencias sociales. México: McGraw-Hill.
Mackey, T., y Ho, J. (2005). Implementing a convergent model for information literacy: combining research and web literacy. Journal of Information Science, 31 (6). 541-555.
Mahmood, K., Khan, M. y Siddique, N. (2008). Volunteer Endeavors to Promot ICT in a Developing country: the case of the Pakistan Library Automation Group. Information Development. 24 (2), 135-142.
Marcoulides, G., Emrich, Ch. and Marcoulides, L. (2008). Testing for Multigroup Invariance of the Computer Anxiety Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 68 (2), 325-334.
Murphy, C., Coover, D. and Owen, S. (1989). Development and validation of the computer self-efficacy scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 49. 893-899-
Olaz, F. (2003). Autoeficacia, diferencias de género y comportamiento vocational. Revista Electrónica de Motivación y Emoción. 6 (13). Disponible en: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=640536
Olson, G. M. y Olson, J. S. (2003). Human-Computer Interaction: Psychological Aspects of the human use of computing. Anuual Review of Psychology, 54, 491-516.
Potosky, D. (2002). A field study of computer efficacy beliefs as an outcome of training: the role of computer playfulness, computer knowledge, and performance during training. Computer in Human Behavior, 18, 241-255.
Reneau, J. H. y Grabski, S. V. (1987, fall). A review of research in Computer-Human Interaction and individual differences within a model for research in accounting information systems. Journal of Information Systems, 33-53.
Selwyn, N. (1997). Teaching information technology to the ‘Computer Shy’: a theoretical perspective on a practical problem. Journal of Vocational Educations and Training, 49 (3). 395-408.
SSPS Inc. (1997). SPSS Missing Value Analysis (versión 7.5). [Software de cómputo]. Chicago, EE.UU.
Umrani, F. y Ghadially, R. (2008). Gender and Decision-Making in Technology Adoption amon Yout: A Study of Computer Learner in India. Psychology and Developin Societies. 20 (2), 209-227.
Wood, R. y Bandura, A.. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academic Management Review, 14 (3), 361-384.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Mabel Calderín Cruz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.


